Demanding fair access to the Morning-After Pill

On Tuesday January 22nd, members of National Women’s Liberation gathered at New York City’s branch of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to protest the agency’s decision, one year ago, to overrule FDA scientists and restrict the Morning-After Pill (also known as Plan B) from females under the age of 17.

Morning after pill 1

It was the 40th anniversary of Roe v. Wade and despite 20-degree weather a small group of 10 to 15 people assembled to make a simple point: All females who are old enough to be pregnant should have access to all forms of birth control.

From the press release: “Restricting the Morning-After Pill to females ages 17 and older makes it physically inaccessible to all females because it is kept ‘behind-the-counter’ at pharmacies. The Morning-After Pill is already available without a prescription [in] at least 63 other countries, including the United Kingdom, France, Denmark, and Ghana.” View press release.

From a December 2012 article in the Examiner:

“The FDA wanted to remove any Plan B age restrictions, based on research showing that access to the morning-after pill does not increase a woman’s likelihood to have unprotected sex, and that this drug is safe for use by girls as young as 11.” Studies have also indicated “Plan B is safer than many other current OTC medicines, such as aspirin and other painkillers. While an overdose of any of these medications can have dangerous consequences, it is actually impossible to overdose on the morning-after pill. And any theoretical risk is far outweighed by the risk of an unplanned pregnancy in girls and young women.” (View source.)

If the FDA wanted to remove Plan B age restrictions, why isn’t the drug over-the-counter? The answer: HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, in an unprecedented decision, overruled the FDA decision a year ago to expand access to the Morning-After Pill.

This is the opening statement from the demonstration.

Morning after pill 2

Three women now testified about their experiences.

The second speaker…

Morning after pill 3

The third speaker…

Morning after pill 4

A woman named Annie spoke next.

Morning after pill 5

A satirical street theater piece came next.

Morning after pill 7

This protester showed how someone underage may be treated when requesting the Morning-After Pill at a pharmacy (refer to street theater video)…

Morning after pill 6

This protester showed how someone with no ID could be restricted from access to the Morning-After Pill (refer to street theater video)…

Morning after pill 8

This protester showed how someone asking for “3 packs” of the Morning-After Pill may be treated (refer to street theater video)…

Morning after pill 9

Speak-outs as part of the street theater.

Speak-outs as part of the street theater.

Two protesters "representing" HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and President Obama

Two protesters play HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and President Obama

A protester "representing" Mitt Romney.

A protester plays Mitt Romney.

This concluded the demonstration and it was time for some more information on the restrictions surrounding the Morning-After Pill. At the 0:49 mark of the clip the interviewee explains Obama’s position on the issue. I further asked her to be more specific about the President’s opinion on the subject. Her report of where the President stood did not seem likely.

But no, here is a quote from a New York Times article where he supports Kathleen Sebelius’ decision:

“I will say this, as the father of two daughters: I think it is important for us to make sure that we apply some common sense to various rules when it comes to over-the-counter medicine,” Mr. Obama said.

“And as I understand it, the reason Kathleen made this decision was she could not be confident that a 10-year-old or an 11-year-old going into a drugstore should be able — alongside bubble gum or batteries — be able to buy a medication that potentially, if not used properly, could end up having an adverse effect. And I think most parents would probably feel the same way.”

Please compare the ending of that quote to the FDA’s findings with regards to the Morning-After Pill. “…research showing that access to the morning-after pill does not increase a woman’s likelihood to have unprotected sex, and that this drug is safe for use by girls as young as 11.”

and…

“Plan B is safer than many other current OTC medicines, such as aspirin and other painkillers. While an overdose of any of these medications can have dangerous consequences, it is actually impossible to overdose on the morning-after pill.”

Let’s also understand no one is actually encouraging 10 or 11 year-olds to start experimenting with unnecessary pharmaceuticals just because of their placement in a pharmacy. The idea however is to ensure, for those who have matured to the point where they can become pregnant, that women will have access to a drug which will give them more options should unforeseen circumstances arise.

Morning after pill 13

Morning after pill 14

Morning after pill 15

At this point everyone packed up and rushed inside the nearest Dunkin’ Donuts for a warm escape from the 20-degree environment.

Please donate to www.wepay.com/donations/citizen-journalism to support my work.
Follow me on twitter @StopMotionsolo
Watch and follow my stream www.StopMotionsolo.tv
Like my fan page www.facebook.com/stopmotionsolo

Stay Informed. Get Involved. Be Active.

Remember to keep reading :)

A break from the action for snow

On Saturday February 11, a blizzard named Nemo swept across New York City and many other places along the Northeast.

Trains ran with slower service. Some people stocked up on groceries in preparation for the worst case scenarios and most people preferred the warmth of their homes. Staying inside during a blizzard can be boring though. So I went for a stroll…

2013-02-08_22-29-01_695

A train passing by

A train passing by

2013-02-08_22-31-35_769

2013-02-08_22-32-54_921

Walking around during the blizzard.

The next day I went to the beach…

A view of the parachute jump in Coney Island.

A view of the parachute jump in Coney Island.

I made my way down to the beach and quickly discovered how deep the snow was. About a foot and a half. See a video of my leg submerged.

After a few seconds I happened on this…

Tire tracks in the snow.

Tire tracks in the snow.

Footage of the tracks as I walk over them.

I also saw this…

IMG_1285

The next sight was surreal…

The wind carries snow just over the beach. It's as though the snow is floating...

Wind carries snow just over the beach. It’s as though the snow is floating…

A video of the floating snow.

After walking a bit I realized the beach was frozen.

Tapping on the beach with my boot.

An eagle flies overhead.

An eagle flies overhead.

Someone interacts with seagulls.

Someone interacts with seagulls.

Here’s a nice shot…

IMG_1311

This made me laugh…

A palm tree.

A palm tree.

It was a really nice day and a welcome break from all the activist stuff. Every so often you have to be able to sit back and enjoy the natural beauty around you. After all, if we can’t enjoy the nice things in nature (uranium is a part of nature but it’s not particularly nice), and smile at what we do have… life would just be boring and repetitive.

Please donate to www.wepay.com/donations/citizen-journalism to support me as an independent journalist.
Follow me on twitter @StopMotionsolo
Watch and follow my stream www.StopMotionsolo.tv
Like my fan page www.facebook.com/stopmotionsolo

Stay Informed. Get Involved. Be Active.

Remember to keep reading :)

Standing against Fracking in the 11th hour.

“Not One Well!”

On Monday February 4, as Governor Cuomo faced a decision to allow hydraulic fracturing (fracking) in New York State, hundreds of protesters went to Albany, NY to stand against any vote to allow it to pass.

(This trip to Albany was a follow-up action to the last demonstration on January 9th, which you can read about here.)

The buses arrived at around 10am and all demonstrators went straight to the hearing taking place where the Commissioner of the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) was testifying on the safety of the energy extraction procedure.

Arriving at the hearing.

Arriving at the hearing.

The full crowd at the hearing.

The full crowd at the hearing.

Here is a short video of some of the hearing.

This is a dialogue from the video:

“Questioner: Will the Health Impact Assessment…Analysis that you do be open to the public. Will it be…Will the public have an opportunity to comment?

Commissioner: Sure, it will be made available to the public.

Questioner: And an opportunity for the public to comment…

Commissioner: We’ll have to see when we get it. (Crowd groans) It will be made available to the public and I’m sure that people will comment on it.”

The hearing lasted until noon. As it proceeded the assemblymen/women, senators and others present questioned the Commissioner about the thoroughness of the research done by the DEC on the safety of fracking. They also questioned the Commissioner on the DEC’s performance in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy.

Some representatives whom the DEC Commissioner testified to.

Some representatives whom the DEC Commissioner testified to.

As the demonstrators had traveled to protest fracking they were largely silent when the discussion dealt with Hurricane Sandy. They were not silent however when the Commissioner was asked about fracking.

At first when the Commissioner was criticized on his department’s research into hydraulic fracturing the crowd would cheer for the official who offered the criticism. After several bouts of cheering however, the moderator of the hearing spoke directly to the crowd saying, in similar words, “Listen, I don’t think there’s anyone in this room who doesn’t know why you’re here today. Please do not cheer as it slows down the hearing and takes time away from the official asking questions which are in your favor and support your position.”

Once the moderator said this the crowd changed tactics. They did not cheer anymore. Instead they hissed when the DEC Commissioner said something vague or unsatisfactory, or they threw their hands in the air and wiggled their fingers to show approval of a criticism the Commissioner received. Mind you, though this wiggling of fingers may originate (in its usage that day) from Occupy Wall Street, this action was not in an Occupy action. Nevertheless, some forms of communication are still quite effective.

Showing approval of a criticism.

Showing approval of a criticism.

11 hour frack 3

A demonstrator gives a passionate thumbs down to a comment from the DEC Commissioner.

A demonstrator gives a passionate thumbs down to a comment from the DEC Commissioner.

Throughout the hearing there were a few very peculiar responses from the Commissioner of the DEC. Several times, when the Commissioner was asked something similar to the question which was quoted above, the Commissioner’s default answer was a consistent “I’m sure they will comment on it.” To which the Commissioner was always asked to speak to the public’s ability to comment more specifically.

It needs to be very clear how different the responses of “Yes, the public will have the opportunity to comment;” and “I’m sure they will comment on it” are. The first possible answer is very direct and honest with the question. The second possible answer sounds extremely subversive as if to say, “Yes, I’m sure they will comment but this isn’t our concern.”

Even though the protesters did contain their excitement, much more than before they were reprimanded by the moderator, here and there a few spoke their minds to absurd comments. At one point one audience member called out “Dead cows don’t produce milk!” Overall though the crowd was extremely respectful and managed to contain their passions until the end.

When the hearing was concluded the crowd instantly started chanting from their seats.

The crowd chants “NOT ONE WELL!! NOT ONE WELL!!”

The crowd as they chanted after the hearing.

The crowd as they chanted after the hearing.

The crowd then left the hearing and proceeded to regroup for a march over to a rally in Governor Cuomo’s office building. Here is a video of the regroup.

Now the march made its way to the Governor’s office.

11 hour frack 8

11 hour frack 9

Here is some more marching.

11 hour frack 10

11 hour frack 11

The march continued up an escalator and further to the rally point.

11 hour frack 12

11 hour frack 13

11 hour frack 14

A demonstrator at the rally point.

A demonstrator at the rally point.

11 hour frack 16

11 hour frack 17

11 hour frack 18

11 hour frack 19

Here is video of an aerial shot as more of the crowd ascended the stairs on which the rally was about to take place.

11 hour frack 20

11 hour frack 21

11 hour frack 22

In the middle of the crowd on the stairs.

In the middle of the crowd on the stairs.

Here is a video walking around at the top of the staircase hearing the echoes and walking past those looking down at the rest of the crowd.

11 hour frack 26

11 hour frack 27

Here is video from the press side of the steps looking across to the rally side.

11 hour frack 29

Ex-Philly Police Capt. Ray Lewis stands with the crowd against hydraulic fracturing.

Ex-Philly Police Capt. Ray Lewis stands with the crowd against hydraulic fracturing.

The speeches now began.

Introductory speaker.

Introductory speaker.

Esteemed environmental biologist, activist, and a founder of Concerned Health Professionals of New York, Sandra Steingraber, spoke next.

Sandra Steingraber

Sandra Steingraber

Ms. Steingraber gave a very moving speech which centered around decisions. She talked about her time as an AIDS activist and the uncertainties facing the public (when the disease first became known) of whether or not HIV was related to AIDS. She explained how even back then, with the uncertainty of the source of AIDS, she still taught people how to put condoms on bananas. The idea was to ensure safety instead of risking it hoping for more optimistic findings.

“When lives are at stake you don’t wait for absolute proof to protect people.”

“You move people out of harm’s way first, and then you let the scientific wheels of proof-making grind slowly on. That’s a lesson that we learned too late with lead paint, and with asbestos, with Love Canal, and with the Hudson River. But it is not too late for fracking.

Governor Cuomo, we don’t know everything about the health effects of fracking, but emerging data gives us reason for concern. The hasty secretive review now being compiled by your DOH and [DEC], is being conducted without the normative protocols or public participation.”

“The people of New York deserve and demand a real health study, not a last minute improvised book report.”

“New York’s Health Professions demand a proper, comprehensive, health impact statement as a precondition for making this decision. And until that study is done communities where people live and work should not be proving grounds for industrial experiments.”

She closed her speech with the following statement:

“Governor Cuomo, when I tried to engage your Commissioner Joe Martens in a vigorous debate for his testimony, your sergeant of arms threatened me with arrest.”

“So let me tell you this: I’m a cancer survivor. I am more afraid of my next MRI than I am of your sergeant of arms. I am more afraid of poisoned water than I am of the inside of a jail cell. I am more scared for my son’s life on a fracked up planet than I am with any threat of arrest. I am not afraid.”

The last sentence “I am not afraid” inspired the next chant. “We’re Not Afraid! We’re Not Afraid!”

The next speaker was described as a champion of the anti-fracking movement in the State legislature. The sponsor of the bill to ban fracking in New York State, Senator Tony Avella.

Senator Tony Avella, sponsor of the bill to ban fracking in New York State.

Senator Tony Avella, sponsor of the bill to ban fracking in New York State.

Next we heard from Assemblywoman Linda Rosenthal.

Assembly woman Linda Rosenthal

Assemblywoman Linda Rosenthal

Following Assemblywoman Rosenthal was the director of the Academy Award nominated documentary Gasland, Josh Fox

Josh Fox, Director of the Academy Award nominated documentary, Gasland.

Josh Fox, Director of the Academy Award nominated documentary, Gasland.

His speech, though very simple referenced many of the people he’d met as he filmed Gasland who were victims of fracking.

The most disturbing story he told was of a woman who was afraid to shower with the light on for fear of the water catching fire due to a spark.

To watch the movie Gasland, click here.

The next speaker was the founder of the new Southern Tier anti-fracking network “Save The Southern Tier,” Logan Adsit

The founder of Save The Southern Tier

The founder of Save The Southern Tier, Logan Adsit

Of the many things she said during her speech one statistic which stood out was one from the gas industry’s own data “6% of well casings fail at the time of drilling, and 50% over 30 years.”

The next woman who spoke was Assemblywoman Barbara Lifton. Though I do not have video feed of her doing so, (stream signal was weak during the hearing) Assemblywoman Lifton was one of the harsher members of an already critical panel to whom the Commissioner of the DEC testified to earlier that day.

Assembly woman Barbara Lifton

Assembly woman Barbara Lifton

Actor Mark Ruffalo spoke next.

Mark Ruffalo

Mark Ruffalo

Following Mark Ruffalo was the grandson of Mahatma Ghandi, Arun Ghandi.

Arun Ghandi

Arun Ghandi

This concluded the speakers during this part of the demonstration. However, a few media personnel found interviews with some of the speakers.

I caught a few seconds of this one. Senator Tony Avella explains how while at first the land to be fracked on may be worth something to those intent on drilling, after drilling the overall property value drops to zero.

11 hour frack 28

The demonstrators proceed down the stairs to the next rally point, outside Gov. Cuomo's office.

The demonstrators proceed down the stairs to the next rally point, outside Gov. Cuomo’s office.

Upon arriving at the rally point near Governor Cuomo’s office this was the scene. Mind you there was a very weak connection. As such the clip here is audio only. At roughly 0:23 is when the speaker begins. (Unfortunately, due to poor quality signal there is no way to skip around during this clip)

11 hour frack 42

11 hour frack 43

11 hour frack 44

11 hour frack 45

A photo of the woman speaking in the audio clip.

A photo of the woman speaking in the audio clip.

Of the things mentioned in this clip more of Gov. Cuomo’s proposed plan was explained. Gov. Cuomo intends to drill 40 Demonstration wells in the Southern Tier under the strictest regulation. The demonstrators reject this idea in favor of a thorough study of the potential risks prior to any drilling at all.

The Reverend White was the next person to speak. He was in Albany, with the demonstration representing religious leaders from across the spectrum and he led the group in a prayer.

The Reverend White.

The Reverend White.

The next person to speak was Gregowin Weaver.

Gregowin Weaver

Gregowin Weaver

Following Mr. Weaver was Arun Ghandi again.

11 hour frack 49

Next, David Braun, from New Yorkers Against Fracking, spoke. When he finished he and Sandra Steingraber read the pledge to stand against fracking.

David Braun, of New Yorkers Against Fracking

David Braun, of New Yorkers Against Fracking

The pledge to stand against fracking is held.

The pledge to stand against fracking is held.

11 hour frack 50

The pledge was now read in a call-and-response manner with crowd participation. The preamble ends at the 1:31 mark.

David and Sandra read the pledge with fists raised.

David and Sandra read the pledge with fists raised.

The pledge included the following line:
“Hence, if Governor Cuomo permits high-volume, horizontal, hydraulic fracturing in any part of New York State I pledge to join with others to engage in nonviolent acts of protest; including demonstrations and other nonviolent actions as my conscience leads me.”

11 hour frack 53

11 hour frack 54

Arun Ghandi signs the pledge.

Arun Ghandi signs the pledge.

Now the day of action was at its climax. First another prayer was recited. Once the prayer was completed water was collected in a large glass vase from the canteens people had brought to the action. As the water was collected Bethany Yarrow, daughter of Peter Yarrow (from the group Peter, Paul, and Mary), led the crowd in song.

11 hour frack 56

11 hour frack 57

11 hour frack 58

11 hour frack 59

Bethany Yarrow

Bethany Yarrow

Outside Governor Cuomo's office.

Outside Governor Cuomo’s office.

The crowd by the door to Gov. Cuomo's office.

The crowd by the door to Gov. Cuomo’s office.

After a few minutes a representative from Governor Cuomo’s office was sent to meet the crowd. First, the vase of water was given to the representative, then Arun Ghandi personally handed the representative the pledge he had just signed.

Arun Gandi with a representative from Gov. Cuomo's office.

Arun Gandi with a representative from Gov. Cuomo’s office.

This concluded the demonstration and the crowd dispersed afterward.

It is important to understand the severity of the situation. In Philadelphia a water emergency has been declared as a result of fracking. Why would they have to declare a water emergency? The energy extraction procedure, which was developed by Halliburton, got exempted from the Clean Air, Clean Water, and Clean Drinking Water Acts thanks to the efforts of former Vice President Dick Cheney. Why would it need to be exempted from those acts? There are toxic chemicals in the fluids used to explode the rock. When they explode the rock the toxins used remain in the ground and end up in the underground water supply. This affects everything and the area becomes virtually unlivable due to contamination. If the procedure weren’t exempted from the Clean Air, Clean Water, and Clean Drinking Water Acts it would probably never pass them in the first place.

Why is it unlivable though? Isn’t that extreme? No. We use water for the most basic of things. Water is used for growing food, to grazing cattle, to showering, to cooking, to drinking, etc. Water is the most basic building block of life and the energy extraction process known as hydraulic fracturing destroys this building block.

As a sign of growth and swift progress this article from July 30, 2012, in ecowatch.org states “More than 1,000 businesses, from breweries to architectural firms to auto repair shops, have signed on to a statement opposing fracking, citing multiple threats to their businesses.

Businesses fear the water, soil and air contamination that accompany fracking. For operations like brewing, farming and wine-making, this contamination could lead to a significant decline in product quality and value. Farmers are also concerned for the health of their livestock; Cornell researchers studied six Marcellus Shale states and found many cases of seizures and even deaths of farm animals near drilling and fracking operations.”

In this video from the hearing in the morning the DEC Commissioner is asked about the DEC’s responsiveness in reading the numbers of comments received thus far. What is most impressive from this dialogue is the number of comments pertaining to fracking which had already been received.

Asked of the Commissioner of the DEC “Prior to that you had received about 80,000 comments…and it took you a year analyze those 80,000 comments, and I understand there’s about 200,000 comments that have come in since December.”

There are numerous petitions one could sign to show support against fracking in New York State. Also, you can text “FRACK” to 69866. One could also call their assemblyman/woman, or Governor Cuomo himself and speak against fracking.

Please donate to www.wepay.com/donations/citizen-journalism to support my work!
Follow me on twitter @StopMotionsolo
Watch and follow my stream www.StopMotionsolo.tv
Like my fan page www.facebook.com/stopmotionsolo

Stay Informed. Get Involved. Be Active.

Remember to keep reading :)

Justice for the Central Park Five

“When you’re walking through hell, you gotta keep on walking.”

On Thursday January 17, a rally and march took place in Foley Square demanding reparations for the unlawful imprisonment of the Central Park 5 (CP5), 23 years ago.

cp5 5

What is the story of the Central Park 5?

To quote briefly from the informational material given out at the rally “Five young men, Kharey Wise, Kevin Richardson, Raymond Santana, Yusef Salaam, and Antron McCray were wrongfully convicted 23 years ago in the brutal rape of a white investment banker dubbed ‘The Central Park Jogger’ case. The teens spent 6 to 13 years in prison.”

Informational flyer

Informational flyer

To be a little more specific, without giving unnecessarily graphic details, in 1989 a 28-year-old investment banker named Trisha Meili went for a jog in Central Park. She “went running from her Upper East Side apartment through Central Park that evening, as she often did. Partway through her run, she was assaulted on a lonely stretch of park road and was severely beaten with a heavy object, stripped naked, raped and left for dead. When she was found a few hours later in the woods near 92nd Street, she was close to death from hypothermia and blood loss, and her skull had been so badly fractured that one eye was out of its socket.” (View source)

Due to the demand for justice for the rape of an affluent white, female, investment banker, “police quickly arrested a handful of young men and eventually got Santana along with Antron McCray, Kevin Richardson and Kharey Wise to confess on video tape. They also implicated a fifth suspect — Yusef Salaam.” (View source)

The teens had barely any chance of being proven innocent in 1989. Even without this crime New York City was very racially divided back then. Add the raping of a successful white female investment banker by the hands of 5 black and Latino youth… It was practically an open-and-shut case. The media vilified the teens before any judgement had even been passed. “The teenagers were repeatedly described as a ‘wolf pack’ engaged in a ritual gang activity called ‘wilding.’” (View source)

Even Donald Trump got involved in the media frenzy with “full-page ads in four city newspapers calling for the reinstatement of the death penalty so they could be executed.” (View source) Mind you the ads called for a “reinstatement of the death penalty” to find justice for suspects in a non-murder case.

As far as the evidence from the crime scene itself “Semen found in the victim’s body did not match any of the defendants, and no traces of her blood, hair or skin could be found on any of them. (In fact, even in 1989 the crime-scene analysis indicated that all the DNA evidence found on Meili’s body came from a single, unknown person.) So the entire case rested on an incoherent web of confessions that were contradictory on nearly every detail: The boys could not agree on what Meili looked like, what she was wearing, where or when she had been assaulted, or who had done what to her. As Dwyer notes, the chronology of events that police provided to journalists didn’t make sense, and it even provided a likely alibi: Meili’s running route would have brought her to the place where she was assaulted around 9:20 p.m., when the defendants had been seen by multiple witnesses near the reservoir, about half a mile further south.”

None of this mattered though as they were all found guilty. They were later exonerated when “in 2002 Matias Reyes, a serial rapist with multiple convictions, confessed to the crime, providing specifics that no one else could have known and that closely fit the forensic evidence. (He was already serving a life sentence and had little to lose.) His DNA, which police and prosecutors had in their files all along, was a perfect match with the samples found on Meili.” (View source)

“Each of the five men are seeking $50 million in damages, but their lawyers said so far the city has refused to settle.” (View source from April 19, 2011)

Note the date of the last source article. The five accused adults have still not received compensation for the injustice they experienced. They have at least been proven innocent though.

For a short video about the story feel free to watch this from Democracy Now!

The rally on January 17th took place because of a lack of compensation for false imprisonment.

Panoramic of the crowd for the start of the rally.

Panoramic of the crowd present for the rally.

The Central Park 5 (and friends) of the Foley Square fountain.

The Central Park 5 (and friends) on the steps of the Foley Square fountain.

Here is Yusef Salaam addressing the crowd.

Yusef Salaam

Yusef Salaam

Kevin Richardson spoke next.

Kevin Richardson

Kevin Richardson

Raymond Santana was next.

The fourth speaker.

cp5 1

The fifth speaker,Viola Plummer, who is also the Chair of the December 12 Movement spoke next.

Viola Plummer

Viola Plummer

A transcription of her speak-out:

“When you’re walking through hell, whatcha gotta do?! (crowd responds: You gotta keep on walking.) You gotta keep on walking! Because, they owe us. They owe us. They owe us, trillions of dollars for what they did to these young black, and Latino, men. They owe us! But, the courts will drag this on… If we let ‘em.

If we let them! Because we in hell, right?! We gotta keep walking! They will never, ever come to the table unless we keep on walking. When they look out and see the doubling and tripling of us on the path through hell…they come to the table. Do y’all hear me? They come to the table. They’re gonna lose. There’s no question about that. They’re gonna lose, but what they’re attempting to do is to drag these young black men, and their families, through hell by themselves.

They owe y’all. They owe you! They owe us! Because they (points to the CP5) are us. You understand me?! See them! See her! See him! They’re us! And unless we demand that they paid… They wont get paid.

They will drag it until Bloomberg reaps as many billions of dollars from our blood that he can. And then they’ll put another Bloomberg, whatever name, okay, in his seat, and drag that through. But we aint gonna let ‘em right?!

Because Yusef said, When you’re in hell, whatcha gotta do?! (crowd responds: You gotta keep on walking.)

So we gotta keep on walking. But when we’re walking we gotta multiply. We gotta pull that brother, we gotta pull that sister, who realize we in hell. And we gotta have the patience with our brothers and sisters who don’t know we’re in hell. We have to have the patience with our brothers and sisters. Because what they did to these young black, and Latino, men…! We know and we think everybody does, you gotta keep on walking.

So it becomes our responsibility to make sure that if there’s 8 million people in this city, that at least 2 million black, Latino and Asian people got to know they owe us. That’s right!

So we gotta pull them. We gotta pull them together. We gotta walk through hell together. We started walking in ’89 right in the schools, in the streets…”

(To the CP5) “We love you. We owe you. We will walk ’til hell freezes over.”

The sixth speaker gave another very impassioned speech.

cp5 7

Read it below:

“The culture that pushes us forward is the culture that we develop as struggle. That’s the culture that pushes us forward to victory. When we said ‘Whose streets? Our streets!’ it was in the middle of struggle. When we said ‘What’s coming? War!’ That was in the middle of struggle. When we created ‘No justice! No peace!’ that was in the middle of struggle.

As I’m glad brother Yusef passed that on. When you in hell. Keep on walking. Keep on walking. Keep on agitating. Keep on moving. ‘Cuz only way you gonna get outta hell is to keep pushin’ the envelope. So we pushin’ the envelope against the Bloomberg administration and Raymond ‘Stop-and-Frisk’ Kelly.

We pushing the envelope to wake up New York that they’re not gonna stop, on their own. Some of us think, it’s gonna pass. Like somebody thinks the economy is gonna revive itself. It’s not gonna revive itself. They’ll come with some new tricks but it’s not gonna revive itself. They’re gonna write off millions of people and say they don’t exist anymore, and then say there’s been a revival. When millions are out of work, in jail, unemployed, impoverished, in the hospital sick, miseducated…

So the Central Park 5 is a fester on this system and we gonna pop it. But you gotta stay in the streets. This is the period to be in the streets and to wake folks up.”

“Everybody feels the pain. Mothers, fathers, sisters. When they criminalized these brothers, they criminalized the families, and criminalized the neighborhood. They criminalized our community. And so we’re gonna get this criminality up off our backs. A supporter here said ‘we wanna make sure they apologize.’

I don’t care if they apologize. They ain’t gonna apologize. I don’t want them, they can never apologize. But these brothers gotta get paid. The lawyer Conrad Linn once said that Malcolm [X] used to say ‘There’s only two things this system understands: Money and violence.’ Those are the only two things they understand, money and violence. These brothers got to get paid.

We don’t want their phony apology. We want compensation for them. We want reparations for them. And we even know when that happens it’s not enough! But it’s a beginning. Because when you’re walking through hell, you gotta keep on walking.”

“And our leaders, some of them who are no longer with us, ’cause they gave their lives (for our struggle) used to always say that to us. They used to say ‘Never give up! Never give up!’ ‘Cause you never know how close you are to liberation. So when you in hell you gotta keep on.

They always talk about to be in America is to be in hell. I don’t know how many television shows, how many movies, how many DVDs, how many songs they put out, how many fashions and new tricks they put on us. From Facebook to Twitter!”

“As they used to say, in the South, we gonna keep on walking. We gonna keep on marching until we get to the promised land which is our liberation.”

Attorney Roger Wareham, who is representing a few members of the Central Park 5 spoke briefly as well.

Then the marching began. First the march just made its way around Foley Square through the park and circled the fountain.

cp5 8

cp5 9

cp5 10

Next the march went for walk around the block and then proceeded to take the streets.

cp5 11

cp5 12

Finally the march arrived back at Foley Square and the protest attendees lined up in single-file facing the courts.

cp5 13

A protester holds a sign.

A protester holds a sign.

cp5 14

Councilman Charles Barron addressed the crowd briefly and said the following of a resolution in the works:

“Remember that resolution that we had that the city should support the paying of the Central Park 5 several years out of court. Well I want to let you know because of your movement in the streets, and because of what we’re doing inside, we’re gonna get a hearing on that resolution on February 7th.

The city council, the black, Latino, and Asian caucus. We got all 27 members of the caucus to sign on to the resolution.”

cp5 16

The final speaker was Brother Shaka from the People’s Survival Program 213 Unity of Action.

Brother Shaka

Brother Shaka

Next the group posed for a photo by the fountain and then disbanded prepared to come back for another demonstration on February 19th.

cp5 18

For those interested. In December of 2012, a documentary came out telling the story of the Central Park 5. You can see it at the IFC Center, 323 Avenue of the Americas. I believe this is by the West 4 train station.

Please donate to www.wepay.com/donations/citizen-journalism to support my work as an Independent Journalist.
Follow me on twitter @StopMotionsolo
Watch and follow me at www.StopMotionsolo.tv
Like my fan page www.facebook.com/stopmotionsolo

Stay Informed. Get Involved. Be Active.

Remember to keep reading :)

Reaction to the Jan 30, gun control debate.

On January 30, 2013 there was televised coverage of the Senate Judiciary Hearing on the gun control debate. I did not actually see the C-SPAN coverage but I saw some news reports of it and had a few thoughts…

I’ve seen some legitimate arguments on many sides. Gabby Giffords’ statement was excellent. Wayne LaPierre (head of the NRA) gave a statement as well. He did speak at one point of the 700+ federal gun laws which are not enforced. It does intrigue to know more about these unenforced laws and what exactly he’s talking about. There was also a point when Mr. LaPierre responded to a question about background checks saying something to the effect of “a criminal could avoid background checks to get a gun.” This is true, there is always a way to get a gun without a background check on the black market.

Here is another video of him answering questions about a change in his previous position as he now says collectors should not be forced to undergo background checks.

I also heard a woman make the argument where “The peace of mind that a woman has as she’s facing 3, 4, 5 violent attackers, intruders in her home…with her children screaming in the background, the peace of mind that she has knowing that she has a scary looking gun gives her more courage when she is fighting hardened, violent criminals.” This is true, however, something else must be asked as a follow-up question: When you have 5 violent attackers looking at you, it will likely make you very nervous… Will you be able to aim properly amidst the nerves and panic you experience?

I believe it was Chris Hedges who said something to the effect of “The first time you kill someone with a gun it’s hard. The 8th time it’s easy.”

Now to relate that to anyone, male or female. If it’s your first time threatening to kill an attacker with a gun and you are nervous and panicking your chances of actually hitting the attacker decrease significantly. Also, let’s face it, no one is going to practice killing people to make it easier to kill someone when they are being attacked and no matter how much target practice you get, that’s just practice. The actual deed of attacking someone with a weapon is much more difficult than practicing aim with a puppet or a colored circle target, no matter how threatened you feel.

This discussion will continue, I hope. I’m pessimistic about the chances of any real progress on this issue though, to be honest.

There is a certain irony of all of these gun regulation discussions. The right to bear arms is often referred to for a constitutional argument. This is a very legitimate argument. To quote the Second Amendment:

“A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”

The irony is there is a very serious difference between the Amendment and the majority of the arguments I’ve heard on the issue of gun regulation. The Amendment discusses the right to bear arms with reference to maintaining the security of a free state. I think all of the arguments I’ve heard as of yet relate to protecting ourselves from the “maniacs” in our community. This is really not at all connected to the security of a free state.

Being that these arguments are not related to the security of a free state it actually seems more reasonable to regulate them. Those who are “maniacs” can’t get their hands on guns in a system where they are properly regulated. At the same time, when properly regulated, those who would be responsible enough to carry a gun would have access to one should the emergency occasion present itself if our security were truly at risk. Security from the enemies of a free state, both domestic and abroad, and both belonging to domestic and foreign governments. I include domestic government because there have been a great number of federal laws passed and actions taken which violate the Bill of Rights already.

I feel it is essential to regulate guns. It’s really about time we had this discussion too. While we’re at it though let’s fix the educational system, fix the income gap, end the drug war, end the prison industrial complex and many of the other things which could potentially put any so-called maniac in a position where they want a gun to carry out a mass shooting.

Furthermore, let’s be realistic. The idea of someone just waking up one morning and saying, completely out nowhere, “Hey, I’m gonna go kill some people” never happens. It usually takes a very long time of not being able to deal with the burdens of a crippled society to go out and commit a mass shooting. No one will go through every day of their lives with a smile on their face, being the most socially well-adjusted person in their community; to waking up, loading up, entering a crowded place, and opening fire. This doesn’t happen. It doesn’t and it’s naive to think, or imply, it does.

Every time we say we need to protect ourselves from the “maniacs” of society we are engaging in the exact activity and alienation which drives people to commit mass murder. I’m not saying these people are healthy. What I’m saying is, if you are already an outcast, having others brush off mass shooters as maniacs will only breed more killings from others who are similarly brushed off. Calling people maniacs is a way of not addressing the issue of how difficult it is to get professional help. People often just need someone to listen to them and then they’ll calm down. Yes, some people are mentally unstable to the point of no return but this group will appear to be much larger than it actually is should those who are just in need not have access to necessary aide because of contributing factors. What happens when someone who just needs a little help can’t afford any because of the high costs; or maybe due to a poor economic situation, when they can’t find work because there are other contributing factors, which they don’t have the resources to address because they need help and can’t find work to pay for the help. There are a vast array of reasons which can cause someone to end up committing a mass shooting. The only one we address though, is how to keep guns out of people’s hands.

So much as I hate to say it, amidst my support of gun regulation, the truth is gun violence is really just the most obvious symptom of much larger problems.

It also needs to be mentioned how the recent discussion on gun regulation actually stems more from a reactive mindset than a pragmatic mindset. We only talk about these issues because of a recent tragedy but it’s not as if gun regulation is a new topic for conversation. We’re just addressing it again now because we were heartbroken to hear 20 children were killed in a school. You can also tell we are addressing the issue from a reactive mindset because none of the other contributing issues I mentioned earlier have ever even been touched on once. Okay, excuse me there has been a lot of discussion on Income Inequality as of late. The point is we’re not realizing the connection between Income Inequality and gun violence. We’re having the same discussion we had after Columbine, and the same discussion we had after Virginia Tech; and I don’t think the costs of therapy (for example) rose so drastically in those decades to make them a topic that’s only relevant now.

You need to address the symptoms for certain. You need to wipe your nose when you have a cold. However, when you are sick, you need to rest and fix the rest of your body too.

This country is extremely sick and needs fixing.

Please donate to www.wepay.com/donations/citizen-journalism to support my work as an independent journalist!
Follow me on twitter @StopMotionsolo
Watch and follow me at www.stopmotionsolo.tv
Like my fan page www.facebook.com/stopmotionsolo

Stay Informed. Get Involved. Be Active.

Remember to keep reading :)

A corporate marriage at Federal Hall.

On January 19, Occupy Wall Street staged a wedding on the steps of Federal Hall in New York City to commemorate the 3rd anniversary of the Supreme Court’s ruling in the case of Citizens United vs. The FEC (Federal Election Commission).

Wedding booklet

Wedding booklet

But why would anyone stage a wedding to celebrate a Supreme Court ruling about election financing?

To understand this one must first know what the Supreme Court ruled in the case of Citizens United vs. The FEC. To quote the wedding booklet itself:

“In it’s Citizen United decision, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that, because the law regards corporations as people with constitutional rights, it is within their First Amendment rights to donate unlimited amounts of money to political candidates.”

Now we need to address part of that quote “…because the law regards corporations as people with constitutional rights…” Let’s explore this line further. Does it refer to CEO’s, or Vice Presidents, or Marketing experts who are actual people? No, the line is referring to the corporate entities, which are essentially nothing more than paperwork, who are considered actual people. To be even more specific a few random examples of commonly known corporations who fall under this classification of “being a person” are Chase Bank, General Electric, CBS, Viacom, Apple, Microsoft, Toyota, BP, Pfizer and the list goes on. (Once again as a note to the reader those corporations were not chosen for any reason other than the fact that they are commonly known.)

To explain just how a corporation can be considered a person in the first place you need look no further than the idea of “Corporate Personhood.”

What is Corporate Personhood?

To quote the booklet itself:

“‘Corporate personhood’ commonly refers to the Supreme Court-created precedent of corporations enjoying constitutional rights that were intended solely for human beings. Neither the Declaration of Independence nor the Constitution ever mention corporations. But thanks to decades of rulings by Justices who molded law to favor elite interests, corporations today are granted so-called ‘rights’ that empower them to deny citizens the right to full self-governance.”

Is “corporate personhood” a new development? No. It’s actually about 200 years in the making. Once again to quote the wedding booklet:

“A long series of Supreme Court cases since the 1800′s have entrenched ‘corporate personhood’ in law. Justices have since struck down hundreds of local, state and federal laws enacted to protect people from corporate harm based on this illegitimate premise. Armed with ‘rights,’ corporations wield ever-increasing control over jobs, the environment, politicians, judges and the law.”

The information in the booklet was taken from the FAQ section of www.movetoamend.org

(Here is a photograph of the wedding booklet. On the left side you will find a cleverly political version of “Here Comes the Bride.” On the right side you will find the quotations referenced above.)

Inside the wedding booklet.

Inside the wedding booklet.

Having now explained the problems of corporate personhood, and how the conservative non-profit organization called Citizens United benefited from the concept, the idea behind the wedding was to have a human marry a non-human corporate person to illustrate the absurdity of the legal concept.

A quick history of the Citizens United ruling and its journey through the court system is useful now.

The Citizens United decision dates back to a 2008 Supreme Court case where the courts upheld the “Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA) of 2002-a federal enactment designed to prevent ‘big money’ from unfairly influencing federal elections-which, among other things, prohibits corporate financing of ‘electioneering communications’ and imposes mandatory disclosure and disclaimer requirements on such communications.” (See reference article)

It also overruled the 1990 case of “Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, which upheld limits on corporate spending in candidate elections.” (See reference article)

Okay, that’s enough legalese for one sitting.

The wedding was the focal point of the day. However, as it is also important, earlier there had been a conference hosted by the group Money Out Voters In. Here is Dennis Trainer Jr.’s video from the event.

The program from the Money Out Voters In event.

The program from the Money Out Voters In event.

Now for the wedding. Upon arrival and looking around (even briefly) the amount of creativity and effort put into the event was obvious.

2013-01-19_15-26-07_652

2013-01-19_15-26-29_725

2013-01-19_15-27-05_152

2013-01-19_15-27-09_329

2013-01-19_15-33-22_431

An organizer gathering people for planning.

An organizer gathering people for planning.

The devil

The devil

2013-01-19_16-10-01_368

As with any wedding there was of course, last-minute planning and choreography being discussed beforehand. Here is a short clip of some of the choreography being explained.

2013-01-19_15-30-57_484

2013-01-19_15-31-02_279

2013-01-19_15-31-38_839

What are the headdresses being worn in the above photos you might ask? Here is an explanation. Note, at the end, the person giving the explanation is holding a cigar which is a rolled-up dollar bill.

This event would have 7 brides marrying 7 corporations. Here is a clip of the gown one of the brides was wearing.

The gown

The gown

As the Reverend Billy Talen would be presiding over the ceremony his Stop Shopping Choir was present as well. Here is some of their rehearsal.

The brides also looked lovely as they prepared to be wed.

2013-01-19_15-38-23_179

2013-01-19_16-10-17_801

When they had a minute I managed to conduct interviews with two of the brides.

Here is the interview with BP’s bride.

Here is the interview with Super PAC’s bride.

2013-01-19_15-30-43_211

There was also a king planning to marry Monsanto. Here is quick interview with him.

Now it was time to address everyone for last-minute wedding instructions.

A quick run-through of a parody of Here Comes the Bride was rehearsed. (See photo further up for the lyrics.)

All preparation was now finished. It was time to get married! The brides and grooms calmed their nerves as much as they could, led the procession and made their way to the steps of Federal Hall.

Brides and grooms paired up.

Brides and grooms paired up.

As the procession made its way to the steps of Federal Hall, Reverend Billy Talen spoke with praise of the marriage about to take place, and preached about courtship and the days of young love between people and corporations.

Reverend Billy Talen leads the group out of the rehearsal space at 60 Wall Street.

Reverend Billy Talen leads the group out of the rehearsal space at 60 Wall Street.

2013-01-19_16-15-06_169

Billy spoke highly of the children which would come as a result of the holy union between the human person and the non-human corporation. Of course we all know, when the Reverend spoke of the children to be produced, Billy was talking about the Subsidiary persons.

2013-01-19_16-16-11_515

Reverend Talen also called out about the consummation of the marriage through intercourse that night. In this case we all know he was talking about corporate mergers.

2013-01-19_16-18-19_551

He also discussed the days of pleasuring himself to corporations. This of course was a reference to his time as a shareholder, buying and selling visually appealing corporate stocks and bonds with the greatest investment potential. Over time he’d developed a very respectable portfolio.

It’s worth mentioning how (as the group marched in joyous song) the looks of shock, awe, confusion, appreciation, and amusement were obvious on the faces of unknowing bystanders.

Our police escort/motorcade.

Our police escort/motorcade.

Upon arriving at the steps there were minor trademark warnings from the accompanying police escort, making sure everyone was on the steps and had cleared a pathway for pedestrian traffic.

It should be noted for this event a permit had been acquired. Accordingly, the wedding had to remain on the steps but members of the press were allowed to occupy up to half the sidewalk at the foot of the steps.

Billy stands on the steps.

Billy stands on the steps.

The corporate persons gather on the steps.

The corporate persons gather on the steps.

2013-01-19_16-20-40_816

Reverend Billy Talen brought the ceremony to order and introduced his Stop Shopping Choir for a unique rendition of the Ave Maria. (The Ave Maria begins around the 1:15 mark)

Next the Reverend gave some quick background information to those present, and to the spectators now watching from across the street behind the police line and barricades.

“The corporation in its glorious personhood has reached out to an obviously beautiful trophy wife… A tall statuesque blonde trophy wife… has been proposed to and has accepted the hand of a corporate personhood… body. Amen? Did that make sense to anybody?

This wonderful ceremony has been brought to us by the ‘new Democracy project.’ They paid off the police and The New York Stock Exchange to make this…come to us.”

Billy also mentions Move to Amend and Occupy Wall Street as groups who organized the event.

2013-01-19_16-20-51_316

2013-01-19_16-22-36_671

The parody of Here Comes the Bride was now sang as the brides and their corporate personhood grooms approached and ascended the stairs.

Rev Billy narrated the moment”
“Foreclosure. Foreclosed property is being dragged in here.”
“There’s freedom of expression being manhandled by the British Petroleum. It’s like an unwilling date, there.”
“We have the monarchy, he’s the king, and he has counterfeited a large amount of money here.”
“Here we have a woman whose ability to express her needs has been papered over by a dollar bill.”
“The Pfizer corporations, McDonald’s, here’s Bank of America.”
“Here’s, and here’s the human being. The American citizen! Let’s give her a big round of applause! Covered with dollar bills.”

The American citizen bride.

The American citizen bride.

At one point the police gave instructions to keep the sidewalk clear and Reverend Billy Talen gave a shout-out to his “competing bullhorn over there.”

Corporate persons look on.

Corporate persons look on.

2013-01-19_16-29-54_670

Next the Reverend called up the lawyers and the terms of agreement were read. While they were read the American citizen bride signed her name where it was appropriate.

2013-01-19_16-30-07_314

Rev Talen then asked if there were any objections. After asking this the choir sang.

2013-01-19_16-30-24_685

As the choir sang Billy addressed the corporate person and the trophy wife about whether or not they wanted to get married. When he addressed the trophy wife he says of the corporate person “he’s very handsome… he’s rich… I work for him…!”

2013-01-19_16-37-39_347

A close up of the "flower bouquet" the bride was holding. It's made of dollar bills.

A close-up of the “flower bouquet” the bride was holding. It’s made of dollar bills.

Next, the Reverend asked the bride and corporate personhood groom if they would take each others’ hands in marriage. Here is where the bride realized what she was about to do… Watch.

This concluded the wedding. Next I conducted an interview with one of the organizers of the event.

The organizer’s name was Aaron Black. He said the biggest need was to overturn the Citizens United ruling. When asked how he said one way was for a “Supreme Court ruling, which they already ruled against overturning the decision 3 years ago by 5 to 4.” There are 4 Justices over the age of 70. “Potentially get some new blood in there and get it done.”

He further said a way to do it would be with 39 states and 2/3 of the house. “Right now I believe we have 12 states that have signed off on this and a hundred house members. It’s gonna take a massive public effort. You know the bottom line is people have been sending a lot of petitions around…but there hasn’t really been a big on-the-ground movement.”

He made some good points. Personally, I think getting a Constitutional Amendment passed might be setting sights too high in the short run though. It’s an excellent idea to organize around and the left is certainly in dire need of an organizational effort. Nevertheless it is essential to realize just how divided the country is between the left and right. Furthermore, as it’s strongly divided it will take several years to get an Amendment passed which needs bipartisan support. Several years, which will see many defeats and setbacks. It will also take several years to sufficiently organize.

The other drawback which concerns me is the association Move to Amend (who has been organizing for a constitutional Amendment for a while) has with groups in the Democratic Party. Move to Amend has been spearheading an Amendment to make corporations not equal to people and to make money not equal to free speech. I actually attended a talk once with David Cobb, one of Move to Amend’s founders, and was very impressed with what I heard.

In fact here are two videos I streamed from the talk back in March of 2012:
Talk with David Cobb 1
Talk with David Cobb 2

The concern I have from before is not with Democrats at all. The concern rather is how easy it will be to sell an idea being pushed by those groups aligning with Democrats, to Republicans. In a country as divided as America the prospects of selling something like a constitutional Amendment to those on the right may be very difficult. This is not to discredit anything which Move to Amend stands for or endorses. In fact I support them very much. The question is really one of people on both sides of the aisle becoming interested in something which, though beneficial to all Americans, is up against a lot of pro-corporate propaganda. Even if a majority of Americans (on both sides) want money out of politics they still view the issues from the perspective of party loyalty.

Another thing to investigate might be the penalties for a politician should they have money in an offshore account. Or what the penalty is if a politician has stock in a company who lobbies to him? To say most politicians these days have (potentially impeachable?) conflicts of interests is beating a dead horse. However, what’s not really discussed are the penalties they face for these conflicts of interests and whether they are effective measures to curtail these conflicts of interests.

Hypothetically speaking, if a politician has a few million dollars in an offshore account, and the penalty is no more than say… $30,000… will they really care about a $30,000 fine knowing they have however much more in an offshore account? Once again, I’m speaking hypothetically here and I’m not referencing actual figures. This is certainly something to research and think about though.

We need to keep in mind also, just how much some politicians might secretly like the current situation. They are making a great deal of money in the current political climate. I’m sure there are progressives on the hill but if a politician is profiting greatly from the current situation, they will need a substantial amount of pressure to go against what might be a very lucrative position for them. Few people actually dislike making money and getting rich.

The final interview I did was with a fellow named John Murdoch. Here is what he said:

“This is one of those things where…it seems so intractable and such a mess that you can’t do it but actually Aaron touched on it. If the Supreme Court doesn’t go, the states… You have 12 states now but, you know, every time you really make the argument, you win. People don’t want to watch their legislators that they pay get bribed. They spend 40% of their time raising money. They spend 40% of their time, while you pay them, getting bribed by much richer people to go against your interests…Those who own the very rich corporations and the average man are not the same. You know, they have much greater margin for error than the normal person, and that means they can be reckless with their finances, with the environment with…military. They don’t serve in the military, they are not the ones who are gonna drink the tainted water. They are not going to…live by the tainted ground. They are not going to be affected by…a horrible economy the way normal people are. And so that’s why we’re not represented. This is a very basic thing. I think this is the very core of Occupy. This is the very core of everything that we are fighting against, and it’s nice to see more of a coalition starting to come. You know, they say we’re done but we’re still here.”

2013-01-19_16-42-26_999

Please donate to www.wepay.com/donations/citizen-journalism to support my work as an independent journalist!
Follow me on twitter @StopMotionsolo
Watch and follow my stream www.StopMotionsolo.tv
Like my fan page www.facebook.com/stopmotionsolo

Stay Informed. Get Involved. Be active.

Remember to keep reading :)

A vigil for Jyoti Singh in Union Square Park

On January 15, 2013, a few hundred demonstrators attended a candlelight vigil in Union Square to honor the memory of Jyoti Singh who had been raped in Delhi, India on December 16, 2012, sparking a national (and then international) outcry for justice.

Jyoti, a 23-year-old physiotherapy student, died from her injuries on December 29.

Jyoti had boarded the bus with a male friend and “In a Friday interview with Indian TV station Zee News, the friend said they were both beaten by a group of males on the bus, while Jyoti was also gang-raped over the 2-1/2 hour nightmare.” (See reference article)

The rape has sparked a national movement demanding justice for the men who committed the sexual attack, but also for government action to address the general violence perpetrated against women in the country. “By some accounts, a woman is raped in India every 22 minutes. Statistics from India’s National Crime Records Bureau show that cases of rapes and assaults against women are on the rise.” (See reference article)

“Of the total number of cases that made to court, the overall rate of convictions stand at 26.4%, or 4,072 convictions while 11,351 acquittals were recorded. These included cases pending from previous years as well.

In 2010, 14,263 cases of rape were decided, with the accused being convicted in 3,788 cases, or 26.6%.” (See reference article)

Here is a link to “Legal Service India.com” from 2010 which elaborates further on rape laws in India and also provides statistics further down the page.

Here is a quote from legalservicesindia.com “Police statistics show more than 50000 rapes are reported every year[10]. In 1987 and 1991 number of cases reported were7767 and 9793 respectively. About 26% (11112) increase in number in the year 1992 – (NCRB). There is one rape in every 54 minutes[11].”

As the news of India’s public reaction to Jyoti’s rape spread around the world, other countries recognized their similar problem. In addition to showing support, they have demanded their governments address the problem more strictly as well. In America, for example, it is worth noting how this year, 2013, the Violence Against Women Act was not renewed. As was reported by The Nation how “despite an eleventh-hour effort by Vice President Joe Biden, House Republican leaders failed to advance the Senate’s 2012 reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act, a bill that would have extended domestic violence protections to 30 million LGBT individuals, undocumented immigrants and Native American women.” (See reference article)

“In 2012, the number of U-visas issued by the Department of Homeland Security hit its annual 10,000 limit a month before the end of the fiscal year—for the third year in a row. The Senate version of VAWA would have made up to 5,000 rollover visas from previous years available annually to undocumented women. The bill included additional safeguards for immigrants, and new provisions for Native American women and LGBT victims of sexual abuse as well.

But in the version of the bill that passed the House in May, Republicans stripped out the new protections for these three vulnerable groups, slamming them as politically driven. They also scaled back the law’s existing protections for women—for example, removing the chance for immigrants with U-visas to become eligible for permanent residency after their temporary visas expire. The House bill would also have required a stricter standard of proof for asylum, and would have broken with current confidentiality laws to allow the government to interview the abuser about the applicant.

Over the nearly two decades of its existence, VAWA has been renewed perfunctorily every five years, each time adding new protections to keep it up-to-date with changes in the population and the recommendations of law enforcement and advocates.” (See reference article)

A public effort has been underway to get the bill passed again.

All the above reasons only helped to galvanize the recent candlelight vigil to honor the memory of Jyoti Singh. Here is the demonstration…

The full crowd at the Union Square vigil.

The full crowd at the Union Square vigil.

A vigil attendee says a few words.

The crowd gathering for the vigil.

The crowd gathering for the vigil.

A demonstrator showing support for the Anti-Violence Project.

A demonstrator showing support for the Anti-Violence Project.

Another young lady gave her thoughts as well as I caught the end of this interview.

A banner belonging to one of the event's sponsors.

A banner belonging to one of the event’s sponsors.

The banner draped on the side of the stage. Sakhi organized the vigil.

The banner draped on the side of the stage. Sakhi organized the vigil.

Here another vigil attendee explains the significance of the event and her comfort in seeing support for the issue.

The crowd holds candles.

The crowd holds candles.

A close-up of an actual candle. For safety reasons the candles were actually battery powered lights.

A close-up of an actual candle. For safety reasons the candles were actually battery powered lights.

The demonstration begins.

2013-01-15_17-51-25_873

2013-01-15_17-51-54_983

The comptroller was the first speaker.

The Comptroller

The Comptroller

Next a member of Sakhi, an Indian-American, and a 27-year-old victim of domestic violence read a poem to the crowd.

The reader of the poem.

The reader of the poem.

After the poem was read it was translated to English for the crowd.

2013-01-15_17-58-11_514

Next Chai Jindasurat came to the stage. He is the coordinator of the National Coalition of Anti-Violence programs at the New York City Anti-Violence Project. During his speech he discussed the problems facing LGBTQ communities and how it relates to the recent Gang Rape in India.

Chai Jindasurat

Chai Jindasurat

Next a woman named Sonia Munchi spoke. To quote the woman who introduced her to the stage: “[Sonia] is a New York City-based queer South Asian writer, researcher, and community activist. She’s worked in the intersections of gender-based violence, immigrant rights, and queer and transgenders for over 15 years and with organizations such as Manabi, Sahki, Saga, Asian women’s shelter, and the Audrey Lawrence project. She recently completed a PHD in Sociology, and gender studies, and is examining responses to domestic violence in southasian communities right her in New York City.” (You can find this quote in my ustream archives it is not in this highlight clip.)

Sonia Munchi

Sonia Munchi

The next person to speak was Sethu Nair. She is the Community Outreach Manager of Sakhi for South Asian Women.

Tiloma Jayasinghe

Sethu Nair

It was now time for a moment of silence for Jyoti Singh, and for other victims of rape, domestic abuse, and other forms of violence. The moment of silence was orchestrated around the dynamics of a musical instrument called a Dole.

2013-01-15_18-23-34_172

2013-01-15_18-26-33_15

Next a survivor sang a prayer to the crowd. Prior to the prayer she told the crowd of her experiences, how it felt after she was raped, about how alone she felt afterward and how good it felt afterward to talk to others about it and to know that she, in fact, was not alone.

2013-01-15_18-27-04_803

Next the co-sponsors were named.

From the organization Connect, Sally MacNichol spoke next.

A representative of the Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer spoke next.

Following was a representative of the Association for India’s Development (AID).

Sunsara Taylor of the Movement to Stop Patriarchy spoke next.

To close the evening a poem was read with the musical accompaniment of a dole. Prior to reading the poem though the speaker tried to get the crowd moving a little as it was a cold night.

2013-01-15_18-43-00_94

Poem and dole

Poem and dole

2013-01-15_18-43-50_878

After the demonstration I conducted a short interview with photojournalist Jenna Pope. (@BatmanWI on twitter.)

2013-01-15_17-52-31_491

2013-01-15_17-52-19_359

2013-01-15_17-52-02_992

2013-01-15_18-53-20_913

2013-01-15_18-53-13_62

2013-01-15_18-53-34_679

Please donate to www.wepay.com/donations/citizen-journalism to support my work as an independent journalist!
Follow me on twitter @StopMotionsolo
Watch and follow my stream www.StopMotionsolo.tv
Like my fan page www.facebook.com/stopmotionsolo

Stay Informed. Get Involved. Be Active.

Remember to keep reading :)

Global solidarity for Idle No More in Washington Square

On January 11, 2013 protesters around the world answered a call to support indigenous people’s right to land, the Canadian First Nations’ opposition to Bill C-45, and the Idle No More movement as a whole.

The #J11 call to action website.

The front page of j11action.org

The front page of j11action.org

Following are a few screenshots from facebook events for the day of action. (Profile photos and names have been redacted to preserve user privacy.)

A screen shot of the facebook event for the Victoria #Idle No More action.

The Victoria #Idle No More action.

\

Portland's solidarity action.

Portland’s solidarity action.

New York's action.

New York’s action.

Occupy Portland News reported the following:
Idle No More continues to grow. Tomorrow hundreds of solidarity events will take place around the globe, including many in the US. As well, a meeting is scheduled tomorrow between First Nations and Canadian Prime Minister Harper. Chief Spence is well into her fifth week of a hunger strike in the shadow of the Parliament, and has vowed not to stop until the meeting paves the way for concrete results.

#IdleNoMore Global Day of Action, Solidarity Resurgence: January 11, 2013. We are calling on all nations and peoples, Indigenous and non-Indigenous, to stand together and take action in your community in support of Idle No More—the rising, Indigenous Peoples’ Movement.

There was a YouTube call to action as well.

Then the events began…

Common Dreams reported:

The goal is to raise the profile of the movement, demonstrate our global presence, and give visibility to the growing momentum as a people’s movement first,” announced one solidarity group associated with the movement.

A major rally outside Canada’s Parliament building occurred as a meeting between some First Nation leaders and representatives from the Canadian government began in Ottawa.

A YouTube video was released as well focusing on events in Downtown Van Robson & Burrard in Vancouver.

Many more events happened to show solidarity with the Idle No More movement, its struggle and an understanding of its message.

Here is what happened in New York in Washington Square Park…

Untitled_Panorama1

2013-01-11_14-46-28_193

2013-01-11_14-52-20_318

2013-01-11_14-52-24_725

2013-01-11_14-52-35_500

2013-01-11_14-54-47_851

After gathering for maybe a half hour the demonstration began and a circle began to form in the fountain.

2013-01-11_14-55-49_409

Here is footage of the circle beginning.

Here is an aerial view of the circle fully formed.

At the center of the circle a meditative chanting was leading the solidarity flashmob.

2013-01-11_14-56-13_520

This is what the flashmob looked like from the outskirts of the circle.

These were the final moments of the circle. At about the 2:00 mark the circle (surrounding the center chanters) begins to howl and cheer.

2013-01-11_14-59-24_92

2013-01-11_15-06-32_234

Next an Iroquois woman was brought to the center of the fountain from the outer circle to speak.

An Iroquois woman speaks.

An Iroquois woman speaks.

Then the man who brought the woman to the front spoke as well.

2013-01-11_15-13-42_377

After his speak-out he performed another chant.

2013-01-11_15-15-24_221

Next a younger group came to the center for a brief speak-out. Following their speak-out they performed a chant as well.

2013-01-11_15-18-41_953

The younger chanters with the rest of the flashmob's audience surrounding them.

The younger chanters with the rest of the flashmob’s audience surrounding them.

After this the crowd began to socialize and I conducted an interview with the Iroquois woman from earlier. During the interview she explained the reasons for the Idle No More movement, how it relates to America with the Keystone XL Pipeline, and she also touched on a prophecy. A prophecy of “the great snake that’s gonna run through from south to north and destroy people’s lands.” When asked what happens in the prophecy, she responded that there was “an uprising of the people…of all colors…people that respect Mother Earth…a grassroots movement…”

One can only hope such a prophecy would come true and be successful.

Please donate to www.wepay.com/donations-citizen-journalism to support my work as an independent journalist!
Follow me on twitter @StopMotionsolo
Watch and follow my stream www.StopMotionsolo.tv
Like my fan page www.facebook.com/stopmotionsolo

Stay Informed. Get Involved. Be Active.

Remember to keep reading :)

Don’t frack New York!

On January 9th 2013, about 2000 demonstrators were present in Albany, NY to protest against Hydraulic Fracturing (fracking) and to push for a statewide ban on the energy extraction procedure, while Governor Cuomo delivered his State of the State Address,

image

Before proceeding let’s first understand exactly what fracking is…

“Fracking is a process in which large volumes of fluids – a mixture of water, sand and chemicals – are injected at high pressure underground to crack open or fracture layers of rock. The natural gas, which is trapped in tiny pores in the rock, flows out and is captured above ground. This can take place 3,000-15,000 feet below the surface, often crossing natural aquifers and water tables.” (See reference article from the National Wildlife Federation)

Okay, it sounds strange, but so do new languages. What makes it so bad?

“Toxic chemicals are used during fracking that can infiltrate and contaminate habitat, waterways, and even the drinking water that people and wildlife depend on.” (Same reference article)

Okay, but if toxic chemicals are used safely is it a big problem?

“Despite tremendous uncertainty about both short and long-term impacts, fracking companies operate with almost no federal oversight. They’re exempt from laws like the Clean Water Act and Safe Drinking Water Act, and they don’t have to disclose what chemicals they pump into our waterways. Without proper safeguards, fracking threatens our land, water, air and wildlife.” (Same reference article)

Now one might wonder why fracking is exempted from the Clean Air, and Safe Drinking Act.

Watch a video where Philadelphia Police Captain Ray Lewis explains who pulled the strings.

Proof of what Captain Lewis says in the video about fracking’s exemptions can be found here.

Proof of ex-Vice President Dick Cheney’s involvement can be found here.

Currently there is a moratorium in place on fracking in New York State. The moratorium is set to expire in February. To quickly explain this, according to thefreedictionary.com a “moratorium” is “a legally authorized postponement of the fulfillment of an obligation.” The moratorium will expire in late February at which point, should no ban be enacted (and the moratorium is not extended), Natural Gas fracking will begin in New York State as a source for energy.

The next question to ask is about whether the fracking plant is located near any drinking water sources. The answer: “about an hour’s drive southeast [of where the fracking plant would be]…lies New York City’s protected watershed in the Catskill Mountains.” Now what needs to be asked is whether or not an hour’s drive between a crucial watershed and a natural gas plant which utilizes toxic chemicals (exempted from the Clean Air, Clean Water, and Clean Drinking Water act) is a safe distance. That is of course, if we are to consider fracking in the first place over other renewable sources.

From the same source the DEP commented on how the water is filtered when it travels between the watershed and residential faucets. “The Department of Environmental Protection does not use water filtration systems. Instead, it relies on natural filtration and keeping the water clean at the source. It only adds a few chemicals, to kill any remaining pathogens and to strengthen tooth enamel, before water reaches faucets in the city 100 miles away. It’s some of the cleanest municipal drinking water in the world…” Natural filtration would not separate chemicals used in fracking from drinking water.

Needless to say fracking would pose a significant risk to New York’s drinking water. To be fair regulations on how to carry out the fracking process have been proposed though. (Read about the proposals here.) The question is, will regulated fracking be sufficient protection from health risks? Will the regulations be extensive enough?

Now on to the demonstration, which was energetic and packed to say the least…

Here is a video of the core of the demonstration.

image

image

image

image

Over time the demonstration grew much larger than what can be seen in the above video.

See the full crowd here.

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

The demonstration took up the majority of the space it was in. There was however a small area in front designated for people to be able to walk through. This is what the protest signs facing into the walkway looked like.

image

image

image

image

image

Earlier in this post you saw a video of retired Philadelphia Police Captain discussing the dangers of fracking. Here is the full interview.

What was not expected was a group of demonstrators present in support of fracking. When they came into the main area, where the anti-fracking group was, there was something of a chant-off. Watch it here.

image

image

image

image

image

After surviving the chant-off (they were drastically outnumbered) they found a space to have their voice heard. Watch it here.

As is always a spectacle Reverend Billy Talen performed for the crowd too. (Note: This footage was not taken by me but my another livestreamer Mike Pellagatti. You can find him on twitter @thepellareport

Pete Seiger was present to and led some of the protest in a chorus of This Land is Your Land. (From the same livestreamer as the last video)

Pete Seiger

Pete Seiger

Pete Seiger and Natalie Merchant

Pete Seiger and Natalie Merchant

The demonstration closed at around 2pm. Of course though, the marching was not finished. Here is a video of the demonstration leaving the main rally area.

Here is footage of the march from the last video marching underground to leave the building.

Untitled_Panorama2

Once outside we paused for speeches across the street from Governor Cuomo’s office. (Note: The speeches begin at the 1:00 mark)

The last video was cut before the last speaker so I could get a photo of the water jug containing Philadelphia’s “clean” fracked water. See below.

The "clean" water

The “clean” water from fracked PA

Here is the final speaker.

Here is a photo of the protesters.

image

The demonstration went very well. Will it have an effect? Only time will tell. What is certain though is there will be one more demonstration in Albany before Governor Cuomo makes his final decision whether to ban fracking in New York, or not. This demonstration will be important for a display of public support.

On a personal note though, I’ve never seen so many different ideas for protest signs in any space before and I collected footage for the Occupy Wall Street movement for almost a year. This demonstration had more diversity in protest signs which shows the opposition to protest is certainly there. The question is, can it be organized and mobilized in time?

If the reader is interested there were signs at the demonstration saying to “Text ‘FRACK’ to 69866″ if you want to ban fracking in New York State.

Please donate to www.wepay.com/donations/citizen-journalism to support my work as an independent journalist!
Follow me on twitter @StopMotionsolo
Watch and follow my stream www.StopMotionsolo.tv
Like my fan page www.facebook.com/stopmotionsolo

Stay Informed. Get Involved. Be Active.

Remember to keep reading :)

Keystone XL Pipeline theater in Union Square

On January 8th, 2013 a group of activists put on a play in Union Square to inform people about TransCanada’s Keystone XL Pipeline, Tar Sands Oil, and the issues (and implications) surrounding the corporation, the pipeline and oil.

The Keystone XL Pipeline performance in action.

The Keystone XL Pipeline performance in action.

Here is part one of the Keystone XL Pipeline theater in Union Square.

Here is the second part of the Keystone XL Pipeline theater in Union Square.

(Please watch the above videos to see a theatrical discussion on the Keystone XL Pipeline, Tar Sands Oil and TransCanada, which lasted approx 18 minutes. The performance was informative, fun, charming, gross, and just very well done.)

Here are some photos from the action.

TSB theater 4

TSB theater 5

TSB theater 6

The a performer playing the role of TransCanada CEO holds a cardboard pipeline with a purposeful hole in it.

A performer who played the role of TransCanada CEO holds a cardboard pipeline with a purposeful hole in it.

(Below I have transcribed/paraphrased from the video a majority of the important points discussed in the performance. The following statements are in chronological order with the videos so it’s easy to follow along!)

(Amongst the facts are photos from the performance.)

TransCanada is the corporation who is building the Keystone XL Pipeline which will extend from Alberta, Canada to Texas. The pipeline’s purpose will be to transport to-be-refined oil which will then be sold on the global market to the highest bidder after refinement.

All pipelines are expected to leak in some way and The Keystone XL is no exception. As the performers phrased it: this expectation is somewhat like a swim instructor expecting new students to struggle with treading water in the deep end of a pool instead of working with them to make sure it is safe to have them in that end first.

TSB theater 14

TransCanada’s existing Keystone Pipeline, which has been in operation since June 2012, spilled 12 times in its first year and 30 times to date. To cleanup these spills is almost impossible as once a leak occurs toxic chemicals separate and are immediately absorbed into the ground and drinking water, or evaporate into the atmosphere.

Tar Sands is the dirtiest oil on the planet and its production has quadrupled the carbon emissions of conventional oil. To explain the severity of this NASA’s leading climate scientist, Dr. James Hansen, has been quoted calling the Keystone XL Pipeline “A fuse to the largest carbon bomb on the planet.” Furthermore, he said “If all the carbon stored in the Canadian Tar Sands is released into the Earth’s atmosphere it would mean game over for the planet.”

TSB theater 7

What is Tar Sands Oil made of? Bitumen. What is Bitumen? Bitumen consists of a tar-like substance which is then diluted with liquid-gas products to make it flow.

(For more information on bitumen and how Tar Sands is extracted, and refined, please read the beginning of an earlier blog post where I wrote about a march against the pipeline on Washington, D.C.)

[TransCanada] has refused to disclose a comprehensive chemical analysis of the mixture of chemicals used to dilute and transport the Tar Sands Oil through their pipelines. They have not discussed the human health or environmental impacts associated with the mixture either. Furthermore, their leak detection systems are not designed to handle a material so hot and corrosive. Spills are therefore very common and can go unnoticed for hours, days, and even weeks. This likelihood of a spill, combined with the lack of transparency about the makeup of the toxic chemicals that could leak, is very disconcerting.

How do they get the Tar Sands Oil out? Open-pit mining. This requires the total destruction of the land and ecosystem. “They literally tear off a thick layer of Earth so they can scrape out the bitumen underneath. The process makes the land, air and water completely uninhabitable for humans, animals, and plants.” (Quoted from the protesters in the video). Not only does the construction of this Pipeline require the theft of the land it was built on but it also destroys the land’s potential for future use.

TSB theater 8

Many Chiefs of First Nations (Canadian Native peoples) are speaking out against Tar Sands extractions on their land. Chief Teresa Spence of the Attawapiskat First Nation is currently on a hunger strike against Tar Sands and Bill C-45. She is part of Idle No More.

The grassroots movement called Idle No More, in Canada, has been resisting the construction of the pipeline (and land destruction) through civil disobedience. Most recently the Idle No More movement blockaded the main highway that leads to Tar Sands.

(For more information on Idle No More and how it is closely related to this please see my blog on their flashmob against legislation known as “Bill C-45″ in Washington Square Park.)

TransCanada is also guilty of eminent domain abuses. They have intimidated landowners along the pipeline route into signing contractual agreements for their land. When landowners weren’t willing to sell TransCanada fraudulently stole their land using eminent domain. This means TransCanada has abused the legal system to take people’s land out from underneath them.

TSB theater 9

As far as the argument for “job creation” the Keystone XL Pipeline will destroy more jobs than it creates. Many truckers, for example, will be out of work when oil transportation happens through a pipe. Also much of the steel pipe to be used in construction of the pipeline will be manufactured overseas; and a large section of the pipeline which TransCanada claims will create jobs through its construction has already been built. (See a backup article for this information.)

Will the pipeline lower gas prices? No. A report by Cornell University explained that the Keystone XL will divert Tar Sands Oil, now supplying midwest refineries, so it can be sold at higher prices to the Gulf Coast and exports market. As a result consumers in the midwest can be paying 10 to 20% more for gasoline and diesel fuel. (In the article referenced above you will find this quote: “Job losses would be caused by additional fuel costs in the Midwest, pipeline spills, pollution and the rising costs of climate change. Even one year of fuel price increases as a result of Keystone XL could cancel out some or all of the jobs created by the project.”)

It wont reduce America’s dependence on foreign oil either. Just because the pipeline is being built in America doesn’t mean anything. As the refined oil will be sold on the Global Market to the highest bidder, it is intended for the oil exports business.

TSB theater 11
On a daily basis there are at least 8, identified, known human carcinogens emitted by the refineries into the air.

There’s a community called Manchester in Houston, Texas which is surrounded by the Valero refinery that will be processing the Tar Sands. The children in Manchester are actually taught in school that the refinery’s smokestack, which they can see from their classroom and playground, is a “cloud machine.” Residents of Manchester are often sick and many die young of cancer. Like the Native communities in Canada, at the extraction site, Manchester has extremely high rates of cancer, as well as asthma and other lung diseases, skin rashes, nosebleeds, and headaches.

In response to this there is a movement called the Tar Sands Blockade in the United States. It is a coalition of Texas and Oklahoma landowners, and climate justice organizers; using peaceful and sustained civil disobedience, and nonviolent direct action to physically stop the construction of the Tar Sands Keystone XL Pipeline.

TSB theater 2

The reason for Civil Disobedience is tactics such as lobbying, and petitioning have been tried and they have all failed to halt the pipeline’s progress.

The campaign against the Keystone XL Pipeline has not been in the news very much either because TransCanada has worked hard to create a media blackout around their active construction, and the active and daring resistance to it. This blackout has included reporters being intimidated and arrested.

The first major Tar Sands Blockade action happened in September and was named “Middle Earth.” Middle Earth was a small village built from wooden platforms, 60+ feet in the air, in treetops, where people lived for 85 days. As a result of Middle Earth construction of the pipeline was halted because otherwise the tree-sitters would have had to have been extracted, or killed, for it to continue. Ultimately, TransCanada rerouted the pipeline to go around the tree-blockade. It was rerouted in spite of having previously told countless landowners that the route was set in stone and could not be altered to avoid bulldozing their crop lands, or to go around schools, neighborhoods or ecologically sensitive areas.

TSB theater 12

Another notable blockade of the pipeline took place when two protesters locked themselves inside the pipeline itself, then to 600 pound barrels (with handcuffs), still all within the pipeline. They were eventually removed by the police and their bail was set at an unprecedented $65,000 for a few misdemeanor charges, not one felony. Courts have kept activists in jail for weeks on end for simple misdemeanor charges.

The other notable action against the Keystone XL’s construction started when two activists, while in jail, began a hunger strike. When this performance in Union Square took place those hunger strikers were on their 41st day without food. Skip to the 11 minute mark of this report from DemocracyNow! for more info. You can also find up-to-date information on the hunger strike here which is also the main website of the Tar Sands Blockade.

The hunger strikers say they refuse to eat until their 3 demands are met:
1. The Valero refinery must completely divest from the Keystone XL Pipeline and all forms of Tar Sands exploitation.

2. Valero must invest in the health and well-being of the Manchester community.

3. Valero must shut down and vacate the Manchester community.

TSB theater 13

TSB theater 15

After the performance I had a quick chat with the performer playing the CEO of TransCanada.

TSB theater 17

Next I asked one of the protesters about the health risks associated with Tar Sands Oil.

TSB theater 16

Next the performers, and audience, marched to the TD Bank located nearby Union Square.

TSB theater 21

Here are the speak-outs which were conducted outside the bank.

Some information from the previous theater performance was repeated outside TD Bank. There was some new information as well such as TD bank’s being the largest shareholder in TransCanada.

It was also stated how, according to TransCanada, the existing Keystone Pipeline is expected to spill once every 7 years.

The pipeline is “built to spill”:
TransCanada has indicated up to 700,000 gallons of Tar Sands could leak out of the pipeline without triggering its “real time” leak detection system.

The Keystone XL Pipeline also threatens the Carrizo-Wilcox aquifer in East Texas which supplies drinking water to more than 12 million people living across 60 counties. It threatens the Ogallala Aquifer as well which is the largest aquifer in the Western North American region and which millions of people and agricultural businesses depend on for drinking water, irrigation and livestock watering.

If you don’t know what an aquifer is. Read the wikipedia page.

It was also worth noting how the environmental impact statement done on the Keystone XL Pipeline was conducted by the State Department, not the EPA.

A protester outside TD Bank.

A protester outside TD Bank.

TSB theater 22

TSB theater 24

TSB theater 25

A security guard tells the demonstrators they can't tape a protest sign to TD Bank's Private Property.

A security guard tells the demonstrators they can’t tape a protest sign to TD Bank’s Private Property.

As one can see there are many reasons to oppose the expansion of the existing Keystone system:

1. Climate Change
2. The expected pipeline leaks and spills
3. Eminent domain abuse
4. Water contamination
5. The fact that the construction of the Keystone XL will destroy more jobs than it creates.
6. Increased gas prices.
7. The violation of tribal sovereignty.
8. Fraudulent environmental review

TSB theater 19

In less than 30 days there will be action against the Keystone XL Pipeline. Read about it here.

Please donate to www.wepay.com/donation/citizen-journalism to support my work as an independent journalist!
Follow me on twitter @StopMotionsolo
Watch and follow me at www.StopMotionsolo.tv
Like my fan page www.facebook.com/stopmotionsolo

Stay Informed. Get Involved. Be Active.

Remember to keep reading :)